Exploring the psychology behind doomscrolling – a phenomenon that makes readers overconsume negative news.
In the age of constant connectivity and information overload, the phenomenon of ‘doomscrolling’ has become a prevalent issue affecting individuals across the globe. Doomscrolling refers to the compulsive and excessive scrolling through negative news, often on social media platforms, leading to a cycle of consuming distressing information. Particularly prevalent during crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic, the question arises: What motivates individuals to engage in doomscrolling?
The compulsion to seek out bad news can be attributed to various psychological factors. Evolutionarily, humans are wired to pay more attention to potential threats as a survival mechanism. In the modern context, this translates to an inclination to focus on negative information, as it may be perceived as more relevant or urgent. This tendency is further heightened by social media algorithms, which prioritise content that is more likely to evoke strong emotional reactions, often favouring sensational or negative news and thus intensifying the compulsion to seek out bad news.
In this digital age, social media platforms leverage this inherent psychological trait to their advantage, through algorithmic curation. These algorithms, far from being neutral, prioritise content that are designed to elicit strong emotional responses. This often translates to sensationalised or negative news, creating a constant influx of distressing information that captivates users and traps them in a pernicious cycle of doomscrolling.
Furthermore, a ‘Fear of Missing Out’ (FOMO) contributes significantly to the compulsion for doomscrolling. In an interconnected world, individuals feel a constant need to stay informed, be aware of current events, and remain connected with their social circles. This fear of missing out on crucial information or being left behind in discussions prompts people to continuously seek out news, even if it is distressing.
Curating feeds to follow more positive news sources can help balance out negativity bias as well. Fact-checking content before sharing can reduce the spread of misinformation.
The anticipation of finding resolutions or gaining a deeper understanding of complex issues is another driving force behind prolonged scrolling sessions. The human mind seeks closure and comprehension, and the continuous consumption of information provides a false sense of progress towards resolving uncertainties. This cycle, however, often leads to heightened stress levels and anxiety, as the relentless exposure to negative news overwhelms the individual’s cognitive and emotional capacity.
Plunging into the abyss of doomscrolling, where negative news reigns supreme, takes a toll on mental well-being. The never-ending wave of alarming news can make the world seem overwhelming, fostering a deep-seated sense of helplessness. It’s like being caught in a storm of problems without a shelter in sight. The news cycle often hones in on issues, leaving us with more questions than answers and an ever-present unease.
The habitual consumption of negative news through doomscrolling floods our brains with stress hormones like cortisol and adrenaline. Chronic exposure to these fight-or-flight chemicals can literally alter brain structures involved in emotional processing and increase inflammation throughout the body, worsening anxiety and depression.
Studies have shown social media-fueled rumination on negative events significantly increases the risk of sleep disorders like insomnia. When we’re stressed, the mind races at night, disrupting healthy sleep cycles. Loss of sleep impairs immune functioning, cognitive performance, and emotional regulation.
The constant barrage of outraging, frightening information also puts us in a hyper-alert threat state, making it difficult to focus or concentrate on work or daily tasks through distraction and preoccupation. Performance and productivity take a hit even if our actual surroundings are safe.
Additionally, repeatedly consuming negative information without being able to meaningfully act on it leaves many feeling overwhelmed, resigned and helpless – fueling a viewed cynicism or nihilism about society. Others may adopt catastrophising thought patterns about mundane challenges faced in their own lives after conditioning their brains to expect disastrous outcomes.
So how can we break the habit? Experts suggest setting limits around news consumption, whether it’s checking just at certain times of day or taking periodic digital detoxes. Curating feeds to follow more positive news sources can help balance out negativity bias as well. Fact-checking content before sharing can reduce the spread of misinformation. And focusing our attention on what we can control locally is healthier than fixating on global threats out of our control.
Research offers several strategies to combat the pervasive doomscrolling habit that has become a common pitfall, and cultivate a healthier relationship with digital information. Setting collective boundaries is our first line of defence. By establishing defined time limits for news and social media consumption across communities, we can break the endless scrolling cycle and foster a structured approach to information intake.
Customizing our social media news feeds collaboratively adds another weapon to our arsenal. We can collectively prioritise positive and informative content by unfollowing negativity and actively supporting platforms that promote positivity and constructive dialogue.
Designating screen-free time becomes a shared objective in building a healthier digital ecosystem. By allocating specific periods throughout the day for activities beyond devices – be it pursuing hobbies, engaging in physical activity, or nurturing real-world connections – we contribute to a balanced lifestyle for all. This collective effort not only promotes individual well-being but strengthens the fabric of our community beyond the digital realm.
Evolutionarily, humans are wired to pay more attention to potential threats as a survival mechanism. In the modern context, this translates to an inclination to focus on negative information, as it may be perceived as more relevant or urgent.
Mindfulness practices, such as meditation and deep breathing, hold immense potential for collective benefit. By incorporating these techniques, we can collectively manage anxiety and break the cycle of reactive responses to negativity. This fosters a more intentional and present approach to information consumption, empowering us to engage with the digital world with greater awareness and purpose.
Finally, verifying information from reliable sources before reacting impulsively to headlines is paramount. By encouraging critical thinking and fact-checking as a collective effort, we can cultivate a more informed and less emotionally charged digital landscape. Through this collaborative approach, we navigate the digital world with greater clarity, purpose, and a healthier relationship with information, not just as individuals, but as a united force.
While evolutionary drives and the algorithmic function of news media predispose us to doomscrolling, awareness and small steps can help mitigate and manage this common habit. Monitoring our consumption, diversifying sources and shifting focus where possible empowers us to take control of our online experiences. Breaking the doomscrolling habit requires a conscious effort to understand the underlying psychological factors and implement strategies that promote a balanced and positive digital experience.
