Page 61 - ICE BUSINESS TIMES February 2020
P. 61

There is a hanging threat that U.S.        Tourism:                    There is a hanging threat that
             would take fewer garments from             Middle East has lost its tourism   U.S. would take fewer garments
                                                                                    from Bangladesh than from
             Bangladesh than from other                 attraction after the back to back   other countries due to geological
                                                        instabilities in the Middle East.
             countries due to geological positions      From Arab Spring to Syrian civil   positions as U.S. would not take
             as U.S. would not take any risk about      war to infiltration of ISIS,   any risk about the timing of
             the timing of shipments and orders         tourists have been hesitant going   shipments and orders coming for
                                                                                    Bangladesh may  get diverted in
                                                        to the  Middle East. After the
             coming for Bangladesh may  get             conflict, the tourism of middle   that case.
             diverted in that case.                     east may see another backlash   On the other hand, Bangladesh’s
 fall short of all-out war,   has all the incentives to do so,   and cause permanent damage.   exports to the U.S. have
 efforts to sabotage Saudi and   initially through proxies and   suggest, because many oil-dependent   increased, but Bangladesh has
 other Gulf oil facilities,   asymmetric warfare, to avoid   sectors and countries will engage in   U.S.-Iran conflict and   lost its position as the third or
 impeded Gulf navigation,   provoking an immediate U.S.   precautionary stockpiling. The risk   Bangladesh:  fourth in the U.S. market and is
 international terrorism,   reaction.  that Iran could attack oil production   Bangladesh exported goods   now at No. 7. And if a U.S.-Iran
 cyber-attacks, nuclear   facilities or disrupt major shipping   worth $19.3 billion in the first   war starts now, a new crisis will
 proliferation and more. Any   routes creates a “fear premium”.                     add up and high chances will
 of these could lead to an   Global   Hence, even a modest oil-price   half of 2019-20 with a 5.84   arise that India and Vietnam
 unintentional escalation of   Economy:  increase to $80 per barrel would lead   percent drop year-on-year and   may get benefitted from this as
 Assumptions:  the conflict.  to a sustained risk-off episode, with   missing the target by 12.77   these two countries have the
 Moreover, the Iranian   Oil:  U.S. and global equities falling by at   percent. After continuous drop   capacity to match the low prices
 Following the U.S. assassination of Iranian   regime’s survival is more   Though the U.S. is less   least 10%, in turn, hurting investor,   for four months, exports grew
 al-Quds commander Qassem Suleimani and Iran’s   threatened by an internal   dependent on foreign oil than   business and consumer confidence.  by around 3 percent to $3.52   of Bangladesh.
 initial retaliation against two Iraqi bases housing   revolution than by a   in the past, even a modest price   billion in December, but still   Ending Note:
 U.S. troops, financial markets moved into risk-off   full-scale war. Because an   spike could trigger a broader   Stock Market:  missed the target by 13.54   It is worth remembering that
 mode: oil prices spiked by 10%, U.S. and global   invasion of Iran is unlikely,   downturn or recession, as the   After U.S. killing Iran’s most powerful   percent.  global corporate capital spending
 equities dropped by a few percentage points and   the regime could survive a   one that occured in 1990. While   general, markets reacted accordingly   The signs of a rebound,
 safe-haven bond yields fell. In short order,   war (despite a very damaging   an oil-price shock would boost   as oil and gold prices shot up while   however, are eclipsed as traders   was already severely dampened
 though, despite the continuing risks of a   aerial bombing campaign) –   U.S. energy producers’ profits,   the stock market fell and interest rates   across the globe have started   last year, owing to worries about
 U.S.-Iran conflict and the implications that it   and even benefit as Iranians   the benefits would be   weighing in how the U.S.   an escalation in the U.S.-China
 would have for markets, the view that both sides   rally around the government,   outweighed by the costs to U.S.   declined. Market prognosticators have   airstrike’s highly unpredictable   trade and technology war and
 would eschew further escalation calmed investors   as they briefly did in   oil consumers (both households   an old rule of thumb that investors   the possibility of a hard Brexit.
 and reversed these price movements, with   response to the killing of   and firms). Overall, U.S. private   hate uncertainty more than anything,   impact will be felt beyond the   Just as these risks – that is, the
 equities even approaching new highs.  Suleimani. Conversely, a   spending and growth would   and there are few situations more   Middle East. Although U.S.   “option value of waiting” – were
 That turnabout reflects two assumptions. First,   full-scale war and the   slow, as would growth in all of   uncertain than the threat of war.  President Donald Trump   receding, a new one has
 markets are banking on the fact that neither Iran   ensuing spike in oil prices   the major oil-importing   According to a CNBC report, “Crude   insisted that he ordered the   emerged. Leaving aside the
 nor the U.S. wants a full-scale war, which would   and global recession would   economies, including Japan,   prices see a positive change more than   killing of commander Qassem   direct negative impact of higher
 threaten both the Iranian regime and Donald   lead to regime change in the   China, India, Bangladesh,   80% of the time in the month following   Soleimani on Friday aimed to   energy prices, fears of an
 Trump’s re-election prospects. Second, investors   U.S., which Iran badly   South Korea, Turkey and most   major events. Gold and stocks   avoid a war with Iran,   escalating U.S.-Iran conflict
 seem to believe that the economic impact of a   desires. Hence it can be easily   European countries. Finally,   followed as the next most successful   continuing threats have further   could lead to more precautionary
 conflict would be modest. After all, oil’s   analyzed that, Iran not only   although central banks would   asset classes.” The analysis is based   rattled foreign capitals and   household saving and lower
 importance as an input in production and   can afford to escalate, but it   not hike interest rates following   on “20 crisis events in the Middle East   global markets. On Wall Street,   capital spending by firms,
 consumption has fallen sharply since last   an oil-price shock, nor do they   over the last three decades, including   the stock market fell as oil   further weakening demand and
 oil-shock episodes, such as the 1973 Yom Kippur   have much space left to loosen   the attacks on oil facilities in Saudi   prices jumped after the news of
 war, Iran’s 1979 Islamic revolution and Iraq’s   monetary policies further.  Arabia last September.” How U.S.   the general’s death: The price of   growth.
 1990 invasion of Kuwait. Moreover, the U.S. itself   According to an estimate by JP   stock markets react to U.S. and Iran   Brent oil, the international   Moreover, even before that risk
 is now a major energy producer, inflation   Morgan, a conflict that blocks         emerged, some analysts warned
 expectations are much lower than in past   the strait of Hormuz for six   tensions this time will eventually boil   benchmark, surged in the early   that growth this year might be as
 decades, and there is little risk of central banks   months could drive up oil prices   down to the escalation matrix in the   hours of Hong Kong trading to   tepid as growth in 2019. Markets
 raising interest rates following an oil-price shock.  by 126%, to more than $150   current conflict. President Trump   nearly $70 a barrel — an   and investors had been looking
 Though on the other side, even if the risk of a   (£115) a barrel, setting the   already warned Iran about heavy   increase of $3. The tension has   forward to a period of easier
 full-scale war may seem low, there is no reason to   stage for a severe global   consequences. If the tensions escalate,   shaken the market, businesses   monetary policies and an end to
 believe that U.S.-Iranian relations will return to   recession. And even a more   it might pressurize the U.S. and global   and analysts in Bangladesh as   the tail risks associated with the
 the status quo ante if we see the history and read   limited disruption – such as a   equity market. Pimchanok Vonkorpon,   well. Gold prices surged to   trade war and Brexit. Many
 the equation right between both the countries. It   one-month blockade – could   Director-General of the ministry's   six-year high on the first week   market watchers were hoping
 is also been speculated by the political analysts   push the price up to $80 a   Trade Policy and Strategy Office of   of January.   that the synchronised global
 that  those Iranian rockets were merely the first   barrel. But even these estimates   Bangkok, issued the warning for the   Export Promotion Bureau data   slowdown of 2019 (when growth
 salvo in a response that will build up as   do not fully capture the role   country after the assasination of Iran’s   on the first week of January   fell to 3%, compared with 3.8% in
 November’s U.S. presidential election approaches   that oil prices play in the global   general and stated that this incident   showed the sector earned $6.02   2017) would end, with growth
 and the conflict will continue to feature   economy. The price of oil can   will impact the macroeconomy and   billion in the July-December   approaching 3.4% this year. But
 aggression by regional proxies (including attacks   spike much more than a basic   cause fluctuations in the currency of   period, 6.21 percent less than
 against Israel), direct military confrontations that   supply-demand model would   stock markets.   the same period last fiscal year.   this outlook has ignored many
                                                                                    remaining fragilities.

                                                                                                            55
                                                                                                 www.ibtbd.net
   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66